|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP): standardization and reliability data
Charlotte E Winward
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Peter W Halligan
School of Psychology, University of Cardiff, Oxford, UK
Derick T Wade
Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre, Oxford, UK
Objective: To develop a standardized, clinically relevant, quantitative assessment of somatosensory performance in patients with stroke. Design: Prospective observational study and test evaluation. Setting: Local Oxford hospitals and a regional neurological rehabilitation centre.
Subjects: Stroke patients with a "rst, lateralized acute stroke in hospital, and age-matched control subjects.
Method: Each patient was assessed in a structured way using a new battery of formal tests of somatosensory performance.
Results: A total of 100 patients and 50 controls were fully investigated. Control subjects performed at or near ceiling on all tests, but patients showed impaired performance on all tests. The Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance (RASP) showed good intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for all subtests. There were however only weak relationships between scores of sensory impairment and scores of motor impairment or mobility and dependence.
Conclusions: The RASP provides a practical and reliable assessment of sensory loss, which provides the clinician with a comprehensive picture of the patients performance and can be used to inform and monitor rehabilitation and recovery.
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 5,
523-533 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr522oa

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Busse and S. F Tyson
How many body locations need to be tested when assessing sensation after stroke? An investigation of redundancy in the Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Performance
Clinical Rehabilitation,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
91 - 95.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Fotopoulou, M. Tsakiris, P. Haggard, A. Vagopoulou, A. Rudd, and M. Kopelman
The role of motor intention in motor awareness: an experimental study on anosognosia for hemiplegia
Brain,
December 1, 2008;
131(12):
3432 - 3442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Connell, N. Lincoln, and K. Radford
Somatosensory impairment after stroke: frequency of different deficits and their recovery
Clinical Rehabilitation,
August 1, 2008;
22(8):
758 - 767.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. F. Tyson, M. Hanley, J. Chillala, A. B. Selley, and R. C. Tallis
Sensory Loss in Hospital-Admitted People With Stroke: Characteristics, Associated Factors, and Relationship With Function
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
April 1, 2008;
22(2):
166 - 172.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Valentini, U Kischka, and P W Halligan
Residual haptic sensation following stroke using ipsilateral stimulation
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,
March 1, 2008;
79(3):
266 - 270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. F. Tyson, M. Hanley, J. Chillala, A. B. Selley, and R. C. Tallis
The Relationship Between Balance, Disability, and Recovery After Stroke: Predictive Validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2007;
21(4):
341 - 346.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F Stolk-Hornsveld, J L Crow, E P Hendriks, R van der Baan, and B C Harmeling-van der Wel
The Erasmus MC modifications to the (revised) Nottingham Sensory Assessment: a reliable somatosensory assessment measure for patients with intracranial disorders
Clinical Rehabilitation,
February 1, 2006;
20(2):
160 - 172.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. F Tyson, M. Hanley, J. Chillala, A. Selley, and R. C Tallis
Balance Disability After Stroke
Physical Therapy,
January 1, 2006;
86(1):
30 - 38.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Lin, I-P. Hsueh, C.-F. Sheu, and C.-L. Hsieh
Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients
Clinical Rehabilitation,
April 1, 2004;
18(4):
391 - 397.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|