Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hassan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Clegg, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hassan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Clegg, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 5, 534-540 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr523oa
© 2002 SAGE Publications

A completed audit cycle and integrated care pathway for the management of depression following brain injury in a rehabilitation setting

Nibras Hassan

Lynne Turner-Stokes

Katherine Pierce

Frances Clegg

Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital Trust, Harrow, Middlesex, UK

Objective: To develop an evidence-based multidisciplinary integrated care pathway (ICP) for the management of depression following brain injury in a rehabilitation setting, and to assess its impact on standards of care and documentation.

Setting: A regional rehabilitation unit providing inpatient rehabilitation for young patients (16–65) with complex disabilities mainly resulting from brain injury.

Methods and design: A completed cycle of audit including:

standards set for documentation, assessment, management and review; L an initial retrospective audit of documented patient management against those standards during a five-year period (26 patient records);

ICP development by a multidisciplinary team of doctors, psychologists and nurses based on clinical opinion and systematic review of the literature;

re-audit from the ICP documentation (48 patient records) over a period of 15 months.

Results: The initial audit demonstrated borderline acceptable documentation of baseline mood state and start of medication (54–61%), but poor documentation of review (29%) and subsequent treatment (27%). Introduction of the ICP improved all standards of documentation to 94–100%, except for assessment using a validated measure (84%) and follow-up assessment (76%).

Conclusions: This ICP raised staff awareness of depression, leading to improved documentation and possibly also standards of care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
L Turner-Stokes, M Kalmus, D Hirani, and F Clegg
The Depression Intensity Scale Circles (DISCs): a first evaluation of a simple assessment tool for depression in the context of brain injury
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2005; 76(9): 1273 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]