This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stroud, A E Articles by Wiles, C M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stroud, A E Articles by Wiles, C M Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Inter and intra-rater reliability of cervical auscultation to detect aspiration in patients with dysphagia

Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK; Alison.Stroud{at}nglam-tr.wales.nhs.uk

B W Lawrie

Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK

C M Wiles

Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, UK

Objective: To measure the inter and intra-rater reliability of cervical auscultation used alone to detect aspiration in dysphagic patients.

Setting: A university teaching hospital.

Design: Comparison of the detection of aspiration in 16 recorded swallow sounds by five speech and language therapists on two occasions. Swallow sounds were recorded simultaneously with videofluoroscopy.

Subjects: Sixteen patients referred for assessment of dysphagia with videofluoroscopy.

Results: The kappa statistic for multiple raters showed fair agreement between raters (k = 0.28). There was high agreement when aspiration occurred but in non-aspirating swallows there was significant overdetection of aspiration (p < 0.001 McNemar's test). The intra-rater reliability within different individuals was widely variable (k = 0.55 (range 0.31–0.85)).

Conclusions: Presented with the swallowing sounds in isolation speech and language therapists cannot reliably classify swallows into those with accompanying aspiration and those without. There appears to be a problem of over detection of aspiration. Even in this small study, however, some individual therapists achieve such high reliability (k = 0.85) that they must be using successful internal criteria to interpret the swallow sounds correctly and further qualitative research may identify these.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 6, 640-645 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr533oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?