Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinman, M. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hinman, M. R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 6, 669-674 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr538oa
© 2002 SAGE Publications

Comparative effect of positive and negative static magnetic fields on heart rate and blood pressure in healthy adults

Martha R Hinman

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA

Objective: To compare changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) associated with short-term exposure to static magnetic fields (SMFs) of positive versus negative polarity.

Design: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial using a time series design.

Setting: Physical therapy laboratory in a university setting.

Subjects: Seventy-five adults with a mean age of 30.6 years were assigned to one of three treatment groups. No subjects had any symptoms of cardiovascular disease or cardiac irregularity.

Interventions: Fifteen-minute exposure to an SMF by lying on a mattress pad containing magnets of positive polarity, negative polarity, or none (placebo).

Main outcome measures: HR and BP were monitored prior to exposure, at 1-minute, 5-minute, 10-minute and 15-minute intervals following exposure, and again 5 minutes after exposure.

Results: Subjects in all groups demonstrated slight decreases in HR and BP, but none of these changes were associated with the intervention (p = 0.170).

Conclusions: Short-term exposure to an SMF of either positive or negative polarity does not appear to cause any clinically meaningful changes in HR or BP among asymptomatic subjects. This finding supports the safe use of unipolar SMFs that contain low-intensity magnets (<1000 gauss) relative to the cardiovascular system.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
A. P. Colbert, H. Wahbeh, N. Harling, E. Connelly, H. C. Schiffke, C. Forsten, W. L. Gregory, M. S. Markov, J. J. Souder, P. Elmer, et al.
Static Magnetic Field Therapy: A Critical Review of Treatment Parameters
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., October 4, 2007; (2007) nem131v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. T. Kuipers, C. L. Sauder, and C. A. Ray
Influence of static magnetic fields on pain perception and sympathetic nerve activity in humans
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1410 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]