Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Volman, M J.
Right arrow Articles by Vermeer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Volman, M J.
Right arrow Articles by Vermeer, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 6, 684-692 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr540oa
© 2002 SAGE Publications

Effect of task context on reaching performance in children with spastic hemiparesis

M (Chiel) JM Volman

A (Lex) Wijnroks

Adri Vermeer

Utrecht University, Institute for the Study of Education and Human Development (ISED), Utrecht, The Netherlands

Objective: To investigate the effect of task context on the quality of reaching movements in children with spastic hemiparesis.

Design: Randomized controlled experimental trial.

Setting: Institute for the Study of Education and Human Development (ISED).

Subjects: Twelve children (8–14 years of age) with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

Interventions: Subjects made fast reaching movements with the affected or nonaffected arm on a digitizer in three context conditions: (a) reach to press a light switch to turn on a red light (functional), (b) reach to press the light switch; no light (semi-functional), and (c) reach to a marker (nonfunctional).

Main outcome measures: Kinematics of reaching movements of affected and nonaffected arms: movement time (MT), peak velocity (PV), time to PV, percentage of MT where peak velocity occurred (PPV), and smoothness (i.e. number of movement units (MU)).

Results: The functional condition elicited better quality of reaching for the nonaffected, but particularly the affected arm. Reaching of the affected arm was faster (larger MT; F = 10.21, p < 0.01), smoother (fewer MU; F = 19.95, p < 0.001), and better-controlled (right shift of PPV; F = 16.03, p < 0.001) compared with the semi and nonfunctional condition. Reaching of the nonaffected arm was also faster (longer MT, F = 4.81, p < 0.05), and more smooth (fewer MU, F = 7.23, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that providing a functional context to perform a task may enhance the quality of reaching movements of the affected arm in children with spastic hemiparesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
K.-C. Lin, C.-Y. Wu, T.-H. Wei, C. Gung, C.-Y. Lee, and J.-S. Liu
Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2007; 21(12): 1075 - 1086.
[Abstract] [PDF]