This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chiu, T. T. Articles by Hedley, A. J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chiu, T. T. Articles by Hedley, A. J Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Maximal isometric muscle strength of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong rstchiu{at}polyu.edu.hk

Tai-Hing Lam

Anthony J Hedley

Department of Community Medicine and Unit for Behavioural Sciences, University of Hong Kong

Objective: To describe the maximal isometric neck muscle strength in healthy Chinese volunteers, in six different directions, as measured by a Multi Cervical Rehabilitation Unit.

Design: A standardized cross-sectional observational study.

Setting: A university rehabilitation unit.

Subjects: Ninety-one healthy volunteers aged 20–84.

Methods: During the measurement the subject was instructed to do three consecutive steady contractions as hard as possible, with a 10-second rest in between each contraction and a 2-minute rest between different directions. The peak isometric strength for each of the six directions (‘exion, extension, lateral flexions, protraction and retraction) was calculated.

Results: No significant difference was found in muscle strength between different age groups. Isometric muscle strength in the direction of right lateral flexion was significantly greater than that to the left in men (p = 0.030), but no difference was found in women (p = 0.297). Isometric strength in all directions in men was 1.2–1.7 times that in women (all p < 0.028). Correlations between physical measurements (height and weight) and strength values were all insignificant in both genders.

Conclusion: Men have approximately 20–70% greater isometric neck muscle strength than women. Both men and women can maintain high levels of cervical muscle strength in six different directions up to their seventh decade. There is no significant correlation between physical measurements and isometric neck muscle strength.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Rezasoltani, J Ylinen, A-H Bakhtiary, M Norozi, and M Montazeri Cervical muscle strength measurement is dependent on the location of thoracic support Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 42(5): 379 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L O Mikkelsson, H Nupponen, J Kaprio, H Kautiainen, M Mikkelsson, and U M Kujala Adolescent flexibility, endurance strength, and physical activity as predictors of adult tension neck, low back pain, and knee injury: a 25 year follow up study Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2006; 40(2): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ylinen Analysis of strength measures of different sexes Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 691 - 691. [PDF]

				J. Ylinen, E.-P. Takala, M. Nykanen, A. Hakkinen, E. Malkia, T. Pohjolainen, S.-L. Karppi, H. Kautiainen, and O. Airaksinen Active Neck Muscle Training in the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, May 21, 2003; 289(19): 2509 - 2516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]