Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, K
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, G D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, K
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, G D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 7, 795-799 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr556oa
© 2002 SAGE Publications

The effect of a first vaginal delivery on the integrity of the pelvic ‘ oor musculature

K Marshall

D M Walsh

G D Baxter

Rehabilitation Sciences Research Group, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Northern Ireland

Objective: To assess the specific effect of delivery of the first child on the integrity of the pelvic floor musculature.

Design: A prospective study of two groups of females with no symptoms of urinary incontinence.

Setting: Physiotherapy Department, Rotunda Lying In Hospital, Dublin.

Subjects: Two groups of healthy female physiotherapists (age range 20–28 years) were recruited for the study: group 1 consisted of nulliparous females (n = 10) and group 2 consisted of primiparous females who were 9–10 months post delivery (n = 10).

Intervention and main outcome measures: Assessment of the pelvic floor musculature was performed by digital assessment, electromyography and perineometry.

Results: For all data, the nulliparous group showed evidence of greater pelvic floor strength and endurance. Analysis of anterior and posterior electromyography data showed significantly stronger contractions in the nulliparous group (p = 0.0001 and 0.044). During a maximum contraction of the pelvic floor muscles, the anterior resting EMG activity increased by 9 ± 6 µV (mean ± SD) in the primiparous group compared with an increment of 22.3 ± 4.74 µV in the nulliparous group. Posterior EMG resting activity increased by 19.7 ± 7.65 µV (mean ± SD) in the nulliparous group compared with 13.8 ± 8.19 µV in the primiparous group. There were significant differences between the two groups for the four types of digital muscle assessment (p < 0.0013). In addition, there was a greater increase in perineometry readings in the nulliparous group (increment = 5.6 ± 2.5, mean ± SD) compared with the primiparous group (increment = 3.1 ± 0.9; mean ± SD).

Conclusions: This study suggests that irrespective of lack of symptoms of urinary incontinence, it would appear advisable that all women should undertake a prescribed programme of pelvic floor rehabilitation exercises after childbirth.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?