Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valentine, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valentine, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. M
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Rehabilitation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Deciding whether a change in a patient's performance is a genuine change

John Valentine

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK

Janet M Simpson

School of Physiotherapy, Kingston University/St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

Our purpose is to help clinicians decide whether a measured change in a patient's performance, usually in the direction of improvement, is likely to represent a true change. We set out the calculations to derive a minimal statistically signi'cant change in certain measures commonly used in evaluating the outcome of rehabilitation. Many of these test measurements, e.g. walking time, are likely to show increased variability within patients as the mean level of performance increases in magnitude. We pay particular attention to the calculations in this case as the data should be transformed to remove the relationship by taking their natural logarithm. Con'dence interval calculations for single measurements and for differences between two measurements (using the repeatability coef'cient) are given both for data that show and for data that do not show a relation between variation and level of performance.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 8, 837-842 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr568oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. M Simpson, J. Valentine, and C. Worsfold
The Standardized Three-metre Walking Test for elderly people (WALK3m): repeatability and real change
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2002; 16(8): 843 - 850.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement