This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chiu, T. T. W. Articles by Lo, S. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chiu, T. T. W. Articles by Lo, S. K. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Evaluation of cervical range of motion and isometric neck muscle strength: reliability and validity

Sing Kai Lo

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom Kowloon, Hong Kong

Objective: To examine the test–retest reliability and construct validity of cervical active range of motion and isometric neck muscle strength as measured by the Multi Cervical Rehabilitation Unit (Hanoun Medical Inc., Ontario).

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: Institutional practice.

Subjects: Twenty-one patients with neck pain and 25 healthy volunteers.

Methods: After a trial-run session, active range of motion (AROM) was measured in the subsequent two sessions, with 2–3 days in between. During each session, three measurements were taken for each direction (flexion, extension, lateral flexions and rotations). The measurement of isometric strength was after a 15-minute break following completion of the measurement of AROM. Three measurements were made for each of the six directions (flexion, extension, lateral flexions, protraction and retraction). The software of the Multi Cervical Rehabilitation Unit automatically recorded and calculated the maximum AROM and isometric strength.

Results: There was a good to high level of reliability in the measurement of AROM for both groups of subjects, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.81 to 0.96. Results also demonstrated very good to excellent reliability in isometric strength measurement (ICCs ranged from 0.92 to 0.99). Moreover, there was a significant difference in isometric neck muscle strength (p = 0.001) and in AROM (p = 0.034) between the two groups.

Conclusions: The Multi Cervical Rehabilitation Unit was found to be reliable and valid for testing the cervical active range of motion and isometric neck muscle strength for both normal and patient subjects.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.-C. Lee, T. T.W. Chiu, and T.-H. Lam The role of fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with neck pain: relationships with current and future disability and work capacity Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2007; 21(9): 812 - 821. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. T. Chiu, C. W. Hui-Chan, and G. Cheing A randomized clinical trial of TENS and exercise for patients with chronic neck pain Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2005; 19(8): 850 - 860. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Ylinen Analysis of strength measures of different sexes Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 691 - 691. [PDF]