Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sackley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pound, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sackley, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pound, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 8, 859-866 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr557oa

Setting priorities for a discharge plan for stroke patients entering nursing home care

Cath Sackley

Trent Institute for Health Services Research, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK

Kate Pound

Division of Stroke Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK

Objective: To agree priorities for the structure and content of the discharge process for stroke patients entering nursing home care.

Design: A formal priority-setting exercise using the Nominal Group Technique.

Participants: A panel of 12 members of a multidisciplinary team from a hospital and community setting with experience in the management of stroke patients on a daily basis.

Results: Agreement was good and improved during the process (Kendall coefficient of concordance ‘W’ increased from 0.48 to 0.58 for physical care needs, 0.45 to 0.75 for care needs and 0.56 to 0.72 for the discharge process). The priorities for discharge were:

1) Plans need to be co-ordinated by one person

2) Clear written information on medication should be provided

3) Clear written information on nutritional needs should be provided.

Conclusion: Agreement was reached by a panel of clinicians on an evidencebased discharge plan for stroke patients entering nursing home care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Norrving, P. Wester, K. S. Sunnerhagen, A. Terent, A. Sohlberg, F. Berggren, P.-O. Wester, K. Asplund, for the Stroke Guidelines Working Group,, and National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, S
Beyond Conventional Stroke Guidelines: Setting Priorities
Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2185 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. Leeds, J. Meara, and P. Hobson
The impact of discharge to a care home on longer term stroke outcomes
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2004; 18(8): 924 - 928.
[Abstract] [PDF]