Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D. T
Right arrow Articles by Halligan, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wade, D. T
Right arrow Articles by Halligan, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 17, No. 4, 349-354 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr619ed

Editorial

New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour

Derick T Wade

Peter Halligan

The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning (WHO ICF) is a good but incomplete framework for describing the situation of someone with long-term ill health. Several deficiencies exist for which improvements are suggested. The WHO needs to integrate the ICF with the ICD-10 to form a comprehensive system of classification of illness. Words are needed for normality at the level of organ and person, and the words ‘histology’ and ‘physiology’, and ‘anatomy’ and ‘capacity’ are suggested for the two levels respectively. A fourth context, that of time, is needed to understand fully a person's situation. The classification framework needs to take more account of the patient. It needs to recognize two separate perspectives, that of the subject and that of external observers and it needs to recognize two other specific person-centred phenomena: free will and quality of life. With changes and additions to take account of these deficiencies, the WHO ICF can be used as a powerful analytic and explanatory model of human experience and behaviour in any situation, not only in illness and disease.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
A. T Lettinga, S. van Twillert, B. J. Poels, and K. Postema
Distinguishing theories of dysfunction, treatment and care. Reflections on 'Describing rehabilitation interventions'
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2006; 20(5): 369 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
D. T Wade
Describing rehabilitation interventions
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2005; 19(8): 811 - 818.
[Abstract] [PDF]