This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lilley, S. A Articles by Francis, V. M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lilley, S. A Articles by Francis, V. M Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Family Issues Stroke Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A qualitative study of stroke patients' and carers' perceptions of the stroke family support organizer service

Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Nottinghamshire NHS Trust, UK

Nadina B Lincoln

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK

Valerie M Francis

Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Nottinghamshire NHS Trust, UK

Objective: To investigate stroke patients’ and carers’ perceptions of the family support organizer (FSO) service in order to highlight its value for potential purchasers and to help shed light on findings from randomized controlled trials.

Design and subjects: Twenty semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a sub sample of stroke patients and their primary informal carers after completion of nine-month outcome assessments as part of a randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Community stroke services in North Nottinghamshire, UK.

Results: Interviewees who received the service reported that the presence of an FSO was valuable in many respects, including helping to claim benefits, as a source of information on stroke, and providing continuity between stroke services. Emotional support was only described by a few. Interviewees who did not receive the service described feelings of isolation and being let down by other stroke services after discharge. They also reported problems accessing information. Help needed to address the practical problems after stroke was commonly reported. For those who did not receive the FSO service, access to support appeared to be found through other channels.

Conclusion: The FSO service appeared to be an information service. In order to evaluate community stroke services, a mixture of qualitative and quantitative outcome measures are necessary.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 17, No. 5, 540-547 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr647oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Lloyd, A. Gatherer, and S. Kalsy Conducting Qualitative Interview Research With People With Expressive Language Difficulties Qual Health Res, December 1, 2006; 16(10): 1386 - 1404. [Abstract] [PDF]