Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Post, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Witte, L. P d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Post, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Witte, L. P d.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Good inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients

Marcel WM Post

Luc P de Witte

IRv, Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands

Objective: To assess inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) when used by occupational therapists in stroke patients.

Design: Independent administration of the FAI by occupational therapists in 45 stroke outpatients.

Setting: Outpatient departments of two Dutch rehabilitation centres.

Statistics: Agreement between pairs of raters was assessed at item level using weighted Kappa and the percentage absolute agreement and for the total score using intra-class correlations (ICC), Bland–Altman plots and computation of the smallest real difference (SMR).

Results: ICC of the total score was good (0.90; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.82–0.94). The Bland–Altman plot did not reveal relationships between agreement and height of scores. Reliability at item level was good (kappa >0.60) in 11 out of 15 items. The item ‘gainful work’ showed high agreement but a low kappa due to an extremely skewed score distribution. Reliability was insufficient in three items: ‘local shopping’, ‘social occasions’ and ‘actively pursuing hobby’. Clarification of scoring instructions of these items might further improve the inter-rater reliability of the FAI.

Conclusion: The FAI is a reliable instrument to measure outcomes of outpatient rehabilitation in patients with stroke.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 17, No. 5, 548-552 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr648oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. W.M. Post, H. Festen, I. G. van de Port, and J. M.A. Visser-Meily
Reproducibility of the Caregiver Strain Index and the Caregiver Reaction Assessment in partners of stroke patients living in the Dutch community
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 2007; 21(11): 1050 - 1055.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement