SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lackner, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hummelsheim, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lackner, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hummelsheim, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Motor-evoked potentials are facilitated during perceptual identification of hand position in healthy subjects and stroke patients

Eva Lackner

Horst Hummelsheim

NRZ Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, Germany

Objective: To delineate the facilitatory and/or inhibitory influence of relevant and irrelevant sensory afferent information to the motor cortex. The study is based on the assumption that sensorimotor coupling is crucial for motor learning and recovery.

Design: The interaction of a standard transcranial magnetic stimulus (TMS) with the facilitatory and/or inhibitory influence that proprioceptive afferent information exerts on the motor cortex was investigated.

Setting: A neurological rehabilitation hospital.

Subjects: Sixteen healthy subjects and 14 stroke patients.

Main outcome measures: Amplitudes and latencies of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the extensor carpi radialis muscle. The influence of a sensory discrimination task was compared with the influence of a sensory input irrelevant for the task and to a verbal memory task. Recordings were taken after the hand had been moved passively in one of four different positions.

Results: In the first trial, TMS was applied without any demand on the subjects. In the second trial, subjects were asked to identify the respective hand position and in the third trial a noun presented at a respective hand position had to be memorized and reproduced after TMS. The sensory discrimination task exerted by far the most prominent facilitatory effect on MEP amplitudes and latencies. An unspecific, albeit reproducible influence on MEP amplitudes was observed when a noun presented at a respective hand position had to be remembered.

Conclusions: Using a neurophysiological approach the study demonstrates that a sensory discrimination task based on relevant afferent information to motor centres of the brain forms a prominent facilitatory intervention for those muscle groups that are involved in the task. This holds true for healthy subjects and for hemiparetic stroke patients.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 17, No. 6, 648-655 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr660oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. I.E. Renner, H. Woldag, and H. Hummelsheim
Central Compensation at Short Muscle Range Is Differentially Affected in Cortical Versus Subcortical Strokes
Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2076 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement