This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Malouin, F. Articles by Richards, C. L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Malouin, F. Articles by Richards, C. L Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A fluidity scale for evaluating the motor strategy of the rise-to-walk task after stroke

Bradford McFadyen

Lise Dion

Carol L Richards

Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Canada

Objective: (1) To develop an ordinal scale (content validity) for assessing ‘uidity of the rise-to-walk task (RTW); (2) to examine the concurrent validity of the ‘uidity scale; (3) to study the inter-rater reliability of the scale.

Design: A group of physical therapists participated in the scale development (content validity); a cross-sectional design was used to study the agreement between the ‘uidity scale and the ‘uidity index (criterion measure) obtained with the instrumented method (concurrent validity) and to examine the inter-rater reliability of the scale.

Setting: Rehabilitation centre.

Subjects: Nineteen persons with a chronic stroke and 19 age and gender-matched healthy subjects.

Main outcome measures: For the validation study: the ‘uidity index (FI) and the scores from the ‘uidity scale; for the inter-rater reliability study: duration of the RTW task and ‘uidity scores.

Results: The FI values did not overlap across categories of the scale and the relationship between FI values and the ‘uidity scores was 0.99. The weighted kappa (k_w) indicated a substantial level of agreement between the new raters (k_w = 0.78) and between the new raters and the expert rater (k_w = 0.71). Corresponding mean intraclass correlation coefficients for the RTW duration were 0.95.

Conclusion: These results indicate that the descriptors of the scale provided a gradation of ‘uidity comparable to the gold standard measure (FI) and that trained clinicians can use the ‘uidity scale with a substantial level of reliability. The RTW task is a simple clinical tool for assessing mobility and motor strategies (locomotor co-ordination) in patients presenting varying degrees of motor recovery after stroke.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 17, No. 6, 674-684 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr663oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?