SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Winsor, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Winsor, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A randomized controlled trial of an education and counselling intervention for families after stroke

Michael S Clark

Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Flinders University of South Australia, Australia

Sally Rubenach

Population Health Research Centre, ACT Health, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia

Adrian Winsor

Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Flinders University of South Australia, Australia

Objectives: To determine whether education and counselling after stroke leads to improved family functioning and psychosocial outcomes for stroke patients and their spouses, and better functional and social outcomes for patients.

Design: Two-group randomized controlled trial. Data were collected on admission to and discharge from rehabilitation, and again six months later.

Setting: Rehabilitation units at Repatriation General Hospital and Griffith Hospital, in Adelaide, South Australia.

Participants: Sixty-two stroke patients and their spouses, 32 in the intervention group and 30 in the control group.

Intervention: Stroke information package and three visits from a social worker trained in family counselling.

Outcome measures: Family functioning: McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD); functional status: Barthel Index (BI); social recovery: Adelaide Activities Profile (AAP); depression: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS); anxiety: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); mastery: Mastery Scale (MS); health status: SF-36.

Results: At six months the intervention group had better family functioning for both patients (mean FAD difference 0.19) and spouses (mean difference 0.09). A modest benefit in functional status for intervention patients (mean BI difference 1.3) was related to improved family functioning. Intervention patients reported better social recovery (mean AAP differences: domestic chores 5.7, household maintenance 4.6, social activities 11.5), but there were no significant effects on depression, anxiety, mastery or health status.

Conclusions: An education and counselling intervention maintained family functioning, and in turn led to improved functional and social patient outcomes. This approach helps patients and their spouses to make the optimal adjustment to living with stroke.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 17, No. 7, 703-712 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr681oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
K.A. Ertel, M.M. Glymour, T.A. Glass, and L.F. Berkman
Frailty modifies effectiveness of psychosocial intervention in recovery from stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2007; 21(6): 511 - 522.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
T. Hoffmann, K. McKenna, L. Worrall, and S. J. Read
Randomised trial of a computer-generated tailored written education package for patients following stroke
Age Ageing, May 1, 2007; 36(3): 280 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Bjorkdahl, A{d.}s. L. Nilsson, G. Grimby, and K. S. Sunnerhagen
Does a short period of rehabilitation in the home setting facilitate functioning after stroke? A randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2006; 20(12): 1038 - 1049.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Redfern, C. McKevitt, and C. D.A. Wolfe
Development of Complex Interventions in Stroke Care: A Systematic Review
Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2410 - 2419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. Robinson, J. Francis, P. James, N. Tindle, K. Greenwell, and H. Rodgers
Caring for carers of people with stroke: developing a complex intervention following the Medical Research Council framework
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 560 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement