This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Whitehead, C. Articles by Crotty, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Whitehead, C. Articles by Crotty, M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Falls in community-dwelling older persons following hip fracture: impact on self-efficacy, balance and handicap

Michelle Miller

Maria Crotty

Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Australia

Objective: To compare the four-month outcomes of fallers and nonfallers as well as those with slow gait speed in patients with hip fracture successfully discharged back to the community.

Design: Prospective study with four-month follow-up data.

Setting: Community sample of survivors of hip fracture who have completed their rehabilitation programme.

Subjects: A consecutive sample of 73 community-dwelling, cognitively intact older adults admitted to hospital following a fall-related hip fracture and available to complete a follow-up assessment at four months.

Main outcome measures: At baseline, data collection consisted of the Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), sociodemographics and medical history. At four months follow-up, data collection consisted of the MBI, London Handicap Scale (LHS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), a 10-metre timed walk test, Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Activities Balance Confidence (ABC) scale. Participants were also asked to recall if they had fallen in the four months since their fracture.

Results: Seventy-three participants had complete data for evaluation. There was minimal disability with a mean MBI of 91.2 but there was some residual handicap with a mean LHS of 0.67. Those who had fallen had lower selfefficacy (FES) and greater handicap (LHS). Those with slower gait speed were more handicapped (LHS), had lower self-efficacy (FES and ABC) and lower balance scores (BBS).

Conclusions: Measuring ADL disability alone loses valuable information in community-dwelling survivors of hip fracture. Falls after hip fracture should be a target for treatment and our data give some weight to the idea of a fall fracture cycle. Gait speed, which may re‘ect lower limb strength, is also a target for therapeutic interventions. These measures should be included in clinical practice.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. George, M. Clark, and M. Crotty Development of the Adelaide Driving Self-Efficacy Scale Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 56 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. H Whitehead, R. Wundke, and M. Crotty Attitudes to falls and injury prevention: what are the barriers to implementing falls prevention strategies? Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2006; 20(6): 536 - 542. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M Palombaro, R. L Craik, K. K Mangione, and J. D Tomlinson Determining Meaningful Changes in Gait Speed After Hip Fracture Physical Therapy, June 1, 2006; 86(6): 809 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]