This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jannink, M. J. Articles by Lankhorst, G. J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jannink, M. J. Articles by Lankhorst, G. J Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A systematic review of the methodological quality and extent to which evaluation studies measure the usability of orthopaedic shoes

Henk van Dijk

Roessingh Research and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Jaap de Vries

Rehabilitation Centre, ‘Het Roessingh’, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Johan W Groothoff

Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Gustaaf J Lankhorst

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Objective: To determine the methodological quality of studies evaluating orthopaedic shoes and orthopaedic shoe provisions. To what extent do studies evaluating orthopaedic shoes prescribed for patients with degenerative disorders of the foot, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus and neurological foot disorders, focus on the aspects of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) definition of usability, i.e., effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and context of use?

Design: Systematic review.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning orthopaedic shoes and orthopaedic shoe inserts. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed independently by two raters, based on the 19 items of the ‘Maastricht–Amsterdam criteria list’. The studies were assessed against the parameters of the ISO definition of usability.

Results: Eleven RCTs were included. The methodological scores ranged from 8 to 14 out of 19 possible points. Eleven studies focused on the effectiveness of the orthopaedic shoes and orthopaedic shoe inserts, two of which reported outcome measures and conclusions related to the efficiency of the studied orthopaedic shoes and orthopaedic shoe inserts. Four studies reported some form of patient satisfaction and only three studies paid attention to the context of use.

Conclusions: The methodological quality of the RCTs as assessed according to the 19 different criteria varied considerably. The present review shows that current scientific literature concerning the usability of orthopaedic shoes focuses mainly on effectiveness at the expense of the other domains of usability, i.e., efficiency, satisfaction and context of use.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 1, 15-26 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr698oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Frescos and H. B. Menz Foot Health Service Provision by the Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs: Do Major Podiatric Medical Interventions Reduce the Number of Maintenance Treatments? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, November 1, 2007; 97(6): 469 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]