This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lincoln, N B Articles by Knights, P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lincoln, N B Articles by Knights, P Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluation of a multiprofessional community stroke team: a randomized controlled trial

M F Walker

A Dixon

P Knights

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Division of Stroke Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Community NHS Trust, UK

Objectives: There is inconclusive evidence of the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation by a community stroke team. The aim was to evaluate a specialist multiprofessional team in a community setting.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Community.

Participants: Stroke patients and their informal carers who were referred to receive rehabilitation from a community stroke team.

Outcome measures: Barthel Index, Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (EADL), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) by patient and carer, Carer Strain Index (CSI), Euroquol, knowledge of stroke and satisfaction with services six months after recruitment.

Results: There were no significant differences between patients who received rehabilitation from community stroke team (n = 189) and those who received routine care (n = 232) in their independence in activities of daily living, mood, quality of life or knowledge of stroke. The patients in the community stroke team group were significantly more satisfied with the emotional support they had received (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups in satisfaction with practical help or overall satisfaction. Carers of patients in the community stroke team were under significantly less strain than carers in the routine care group (p < 0.04). Carers of patients in the community stroke team group were significantly more satisfied with their knowledge of stroke (p < 0.01) and were more satisfied overall (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The patients treated by the community stroke team were more satisfied with the emotional support they received and had equivalent outcomes in terms of independence in activities of daily living and mood. Their carers were under less strain and were more satisfied with their knowledge of stroke recovery, the emotional support they received and overall satisfaction with services. The results support the provision of rehabilitation by a community-based specialist multiprofessional team.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 1, 40-47 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr700oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Bosch, M. J. Faber, J. Cruijsberg, G. E. Voerman, S. Leatherman, R. P. T. M. Grol, M. Hulscher, and M. Wensing Review Article: Effectiveness of Patient Care Teams and the Role of Clinical Expertise and Coordination: A Literature Review Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2009; 66(6_suppl): 5S - 35S. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Brereton, C. Carroll, and S. Barnston Interventions for adult family carers of people who have had a stroke: a systematic review Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2007; 21(10): 867 - 884. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. W. Wottrich, L. von Koch, and K. Tham The Meaning of Rehabilitation in the Home Environment After Acute Stroke From the Perspective of a Multiprofessional Team Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 778 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Stoltz, A. Willman, and G. Uden The Meaning of Support as Narrated by Family Carers Who Care for a Senior Relative at Home Qual Health Res, May 1, 2006; 16(5): 594 - 610. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. W. Teasell and L. Kalra What's New in Stroke Rehabilitation: Back to Basics Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 215 - 217. [Full Text] [PDF]