This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Topuz, O. Articles by Ardiç, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Topuz, O. Articles by Ardiç, F. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Eficacy of vestibular rehabilitation on chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Turkey

Bülent Topuz

F Necdet Ardiç

Department of Otolaryngology, Turkey

Merih Sarhus

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Turkey

Gülsen Ögmen

Department of Otolaryngology, Turkey

Füsun Ardiç

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, School of Medicine, Turkey

Objective: To assess the efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation exercises on patients with chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic and Otolaryngology Clinic of a tertiary referral hospital.

Subjects: One-hundred and twenty-five patients with unilateral chronic vestibular dysfunction were included in the study.

Interventions: Eight-week, two-staged (clinic and home) vestibular rehabilitation programme with components of Cawthorne-Cooksey and Norre exercises was applied.

Main outcome measures: Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were completed three times (at the beginning, end of the second week and end of the treatment).

Results: Data for 112 patients in the first stage and 93 patients in the second stage were evaluated because of insufficient compliance of the other patients. The mean DHI score was decreased from 50.42 ± 24.12 points to 21.21 ± 15.97 points (p < 0.001) at the end of first two weeks, and to 19.93 ± 19.33 points at the end of the whole treatment. The mean VAS score was decreased from 5.87 ± 2.27 to 2.02 ± 1.75 (p < 0.001) at the end of second week, and to 1.51 ± 1.29 at the end of eighth week. In respect to both VAS and DHI scores, improvement was noted in 67 patients (77.4%). Age, gender and disability level had no predictive value about therapy outcome.

Conclusions: There was a fast recovery in the supervised exercise session, whereas there was no significant difference in the home exercise session. These findings suggest that either supervised exercise is better than home exercise or that 10 supervised sessions are sufficient to get the end result.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 1, 76-83 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr704oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Vereeck, F. L Wuyts, S. Truijen, C. De Valck, and P. H Van de Heyning The effect of early customized vestibular rehabilitation on balance after acoustic neuroma resection Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 698 - 713. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J Murray, K. D Hill, B. Phillips, and J. Waterston The Influence of Otolith Dysfunction on the Clinical Presentation of People With a Peripheral Vestibular Disorder Physical Therapy, February 1, 2007; 87(2): 143 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]