This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Unver, B. Articles by Angin, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Unver, B. Articles by Angin, S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Comparison of two different rehabilitation programmes for thrust plate prosthesis: a randomized controlled study

School of Physiotherapy, Izmir, Turkey

Vasfi Karatosun

Izge Gunal

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey

Salih Angin

School of Physiotherapy, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey

Objective: Weight bearing after total hip arthroplasty is postponed in order to prevent early loosening, but this negatively affects the rehabilitation programme. For the force transfer characteristics of thrust plate prosthesis (TPP), a new type of hip prosthesis used without cement is similar to the normal hip. We evaluated the possibilities of early weight bearing after TPP by comparing early partial with early full weight bearing.

Design: Randomized controlled study.

Setting: Department of orthopaedics and traumatology in a university hospital.

Subjects: Sixty hips of 51 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty with TPP were randomly assigned into two groups.

Interventions: Both groups received accelerated rehabilitation programmes: group 1 with early partial weight bearing and group 2 with early full weight bearing.

Main outcome measures: Patients were evaluated by a blind observer preoperatively, at three months after surgery by clinical (measurement of range of hip motion (universal goniometry), muscle strength (Manual Muscle Test), functional test (6-minute walk test), hip function (Harris Hip Scoring System)) and radiographical parameters and one year after surgery by clinical (Harris Hip Scoring System) and radiographical parameters.

Results: Group 2 performed transfer activities earlier, had more walking distance at the time of discharge and shorter hospital stay than group 1. At three months, Harris Hip Score, muscle strength, 6-minute walk test, and duration of crutch use were significantly (p < 0.05) in favour of group 2. None of the patients in either group showed signs of loosening one year after the operation.

Conclusions: These results suggest that patients with TPP can tolerate an accelerated rehabilitation programme with early weight bearing and will gain the goals of rehabilitation earlier.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?