Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mercierand, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bourbonnais, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mercierand, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bourbonnais, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Rlative shoulder fexor and handgrip strength is related to upper limb function after stroke

Catherine Mercierand

Daniel Bourbonnais

École de réadaptation, Université de Montréal and Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation, site IRM, Montréal, QC, Canada

Objective: To compare the relative strength of different muscle groups of the paretic upper limb and assess the relationship with motor performance.

Design: Descriptive study.

Setting: Secondary care rehabilitation centre.

Subjects: A convenience sample of 13 chronic hemiparetic stroke subjects.

Main outcome measures: The maximal active torques of fivemuscle groups were measured in both upper limbs (UL) and converted into relative strength (paretic/nonparetic). The UL function was assessed using the Box and Block Test, the Finger-to-Nose Test, the Fugl-Meyer Test and the TEMPA (Test Evaluant les Membres supérieurs des Personnes Agées).

Results: The Friedman two-way analysis of variance shows a significant difference across the relative strength of the different muscle groups (p = 0.017), but subsequent multiple comparisons indicate a significant difference between handgrip and elbow extension only (relative strength of 0.52 ± 0.27 and 0.73 ± 0.23 respectively). However, data show the presence of large intra-subject imbalances between muscle groups. The relative forces for shoulder flexion and handgrip are the best predictors of the UL function, the higher Spearman's rho correlation coefficients for each clinical test ranging from 0.70 to 0.81.

Conclusions: These results do not confirm classical clinical teaching regarding the distribution of weakness following stroke (e.g., proximal to distal gradient; extensors more affected than flexors) but support the hypothesis that strength is related to the function of the paretic upper limb.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 2, 215-221 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr724oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Wagner, C. E Lang, S. A Sahrmann, D. F Edwards, and A. W Dromerick
Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Performance in Subjects With Poststroke Hemiparesis During the First Few Months of Recovery
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 751 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
C. E. Lang and J. A. Beebe
Relating Movement Control at 9 Upper Extremity Segments to Loss of Hand Function in People with Chronic Hemiparesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 279 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. M. Bertrand, C. Mercier, D. Bourbonnais, J. Desrosiers, and D. Gravel
Reliability of maximal static strength measurements of the arms in subjects with hemiparesis
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 248 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. E Harris and J. J Eng
Paretic Upper-Limb Strength Best Explains Arm Activity in People With Stroke
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 88 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
E. M Frick and J. L Alberts
Combined Use of Repetitive Task Practice and an Assistive Robotic Device in a Patient With Subacute Stroke
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2006; 86(10): 1378 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. M. Wagner, C. E. Lang, S. A. Sahrmann, Q. Hu, A. J. Bastian, D. F. Edwards, and A. W. Dromerick
Relationships between Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Deficits in Acute Hemiparesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2006; 20(3): 406 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. H. McCrea, J. J. Eng, and A. J. Hodgson
Saturated Muscle Activation Contributes to Compensatory Reaching Strategies After Stroke
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 2999 - 3008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C Mercier, A M Bertrand, and D Bourbonnais
Comparison of strength measurements under single-joint and multi-joint conditions in hemiparetic individuals
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 523 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
E. G. Cruz, H. C. Waldinger, and D. G. Kamper
Kinetic and kinematic workspaces of the index finger following stroke
Brain, May 1, 2005; 128(5): 1112 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement