Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leeds, L
Right arrow Articles by Hobson, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leeds, L
Right arrow Articles by Hobson, J P
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Aphasia
*Depression
*Stroke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The utility of the Stroke Aphasia Depression Questionnaire (SADQ) in a stroke rehabilitation unit

L Leeds

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, Rhyl, UK

R J Meara

J P Hobson

University Department of Geriatric Medicine (North Wales), Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, UK

Objective: To determine the utility of an observer-based rating scale to detect depression in patients without aphasia.

Design: Correlation analysis between the Stroke Aphasia Depression Questionnaire, shortened version (SADQ-10) and a validated self-rating measure of depression, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The sensitivity and specificity of the SADQ-10 were also calculated.

Setting: Stroke rehabilitation unit.

Subjects: Sixty-fivestroke patients without significant aphasia undergoing rehabilitation.

Interventions: All patients were assessed with the GDS-15 and the SADQ-10.

Results: The SADQ-10 at a cut-point of 14 out of 30 had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 77% to detect depression. This measure demonstrated good internal consistency but showed only a modest correlation with the GDS-15 (r = 0.40, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In the population under study the SADQ-10 did not appear to be a valid measure of depression compared with the GDS and, therefore, may not be suitable for use in patients without significant aphasia.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 2, 228-231 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr685oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
S. S. Bullain, L. S. Chriki, and T. A. Stern
Aphasia: Associated Disturbances in Affect, Behavior, and Cognition in the Setting of Speech and Language Difficulties
Psychosomatics, June 1, 2007; 48(3): 258 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C. M Sackley, T. J Hoppitt, and K. Cardoso
An investigation into the utility of the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire (SADQ) in care home settings
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2006; 20(7): 598 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement