This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hadders-Algra, M. Articles by Butcher, P. R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hadders-Algra, M. Articles by Butcher, P. R Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Quality of general movements and the development of minor neurological dysfunction at toddler and school age

Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Annelies MC Mavinkurve-Groothuis

Department of Paediatrics, St. Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Sabina E Groen

Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands

Elisabeth F Stremmelaar

Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands

Albert Martijn

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands

Phillipa R Butcher

Department of Developmental and Experimental Clinical Psychology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of assessing infants' general movements (GMs) using a new classification and its validity in predicting complex minor neurological dysfunction (MND) at toddler and at school age.

Design: Prospective study of two groups of infants, each consisting of a mix of low-risk and high-risk infants.

Setting: University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands.

Subjects: Group A consisted of 16 low-risk and 21 high-risk infants; group B of 28 low-risk and 24 high-risk infants.

Main outcome measures: Between term age and four months post term: multiple assessments of neurological condition by means of (a) assessment of GMs, and (b) a traditional neurological examination. GMs were classified into four classes using a standardized qualitative description: two classes of normal movements (normal-optimal and normal-suboptimal) and two classes of abnormal movements (mildly and definitely abnormal movements). Follow-up neurological examination with special attention to presence of MND was carried out in group A at 1% years, in group B at 4-9 years.

Results: GMs could be assessed reliably. They were stable over age in about 60% of the infants. Both the condition of the GMs and the infant neurological condition were significantly related to neurological condition at follow-up. Best prediction of complex MND was achieved when both types of infant assessment at the age of 2-4 months post term were combined.

Conclusions: The assessment of GMs is a valuable tool, in particular when combined with the traditional neurological examination, to predict at early age the development of complex MND.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 3, 287-299 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr730oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Mikkola, N. Ritari, V. Tommiska, T. Salokorpi, L. Lehtonen, O. Tammela, L. Paakkonen, P. Olsen, M. Korkman, V. Fellman, et al. Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 5 Years of Age of a National Cohort of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Who Were Born in 1996-1997 Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1391 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]