This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wessels, R D Articles by van den Heuvel, W J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wessels, R D Articles by van den Heuvel, W J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effectiveness of provision of outdoor mobility services and devices in the Netherlands

L P de Witte

S Jedeloo

W PM van den Heuvel

W JA van den Heuvel

IRv, Institute for Rehabilitation Research, The Netherlands

Objective: To answer the following questions: What are the problems encountered by people with outdoor mobility disabilities? What solutions are being offered to them in the Netherlands? How effective are these solutions? How responsive is the IPPA instrument (Individually Prioritized Problem Assessment)?

Design: Analysing the results of a follow-up study using the IPPA instrument.

Setting: The Dutch Service for the Disabled Act (SDA, in Dutch: WVG) provision system. This act is responsible for the provision of mobility aids and home adaptations.

Subjects: Fifty-nine people with outdoor mobility disabilities.

Interventions: The provision of outdoor mobility service and devices.

Main outcome measures: Effectiveness of provisions as measured using IPPA (i.e., the degree to which activities have become less difficult to perform), effect size of IPPA with this intervention.

Results: Problems identified by clients are very diverse and specific but can be classified fairly well on the basis of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); in the main, the solutions they are provided with are very similar and generic. Effectiveness is excellent at a group level, but insufficient for some at an individual level. The IPPA instrument is highly responsive in this setting. Most mobility problems respondents identified, although very individual and specific, were related to shopping, social visits or leisure activities. These specific sets of problems were solved using ‘standard’, generic solutions.

Conclusions: The Dutch provision system should be more ‘demand oriented’ and less ‘supply oriented’. IPPA turns out to be a useful, structured and individualoriented method to evaluate service delivery.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 4, 371-378 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr755oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?