This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Liu, C. Articles by Greenwood, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Liu, C. Articles by Greenwood, R. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Rehabilitation outcomes after brain injury: disability measures or goal achievement?

Regional Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Homerton Hospital and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK

Jane E McNeil

Regional Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Homerton Hospital and the Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK

Richard Greenwood

Regional Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Homerton Hospital and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK

Background: The outcome of rehabilitation interventions following brain injury is commonly rated by disability scales. Goal-setting and achievement are important in inpatient rehabilitation, but seldom assessed as outcomes.

Objective: To compare the information acquired from using disability ratings and goal attainment/variances as outcome measures in brain injury rehabilitation.

Setting: An inpatient regional neurological rehabilitation unit.

Subjects: One hundred and seventy-seven patients admitted after single incident brain injury over a three-year period.

Main measures: (1) Disability outcomes by the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure, (2) goal achievement and variance distribution, and (3) the influence of diagnosis and demographics on these measures.

Results: Patients improved significantly on all disability scales employed (p < 0.0001), with the baseline admission scores being inversely correlated with changes in dependency by discharge (rho0.4). The median attainment rate of long-term goals was 75% per patient. Nonachievement was most frequently due to cognitive problems (38%), followed by behavioural difficulties and physical limitations (18% each). Goal achievement correlated poorly with disability outcome at discharge (rho0.3). Patients who accomplished all their goals tended to be less disabled at admission. Diagnostic groups and demographic factors had little influence on either disability or goal achievement outcomes.

Conclusions: The use of a simple goal achievement and variance coding scheme has been relatively straight forward to incorporate into the daily practice of the unit. It provides useful information on rehabilitation process and outcome after brain injury that is complementary to the utilization of disability measures.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S M Leary, C Liu, A L Cheesman, A Ritter, S Thompson, and R Greenwood Incontinence after brain injury: prevalence, outcome and multidisciplinary management on a neurological rehabilitation unit Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2006; 20(12): 1094 - 1099. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hurn, I. Kneebone, and M. Cropley Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2006; 20(9): 756 - 772. [Abstract] [PDF]