This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miller, W C Articles by Harris, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, W C Articles by Harris, J Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Measurement properties of the Frenchay Activities Index among individuals with a lower limb amputation

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

A B Deathe

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the University of Western Ontario and South Western Regional Amputee Program at St Mary's Hospital, London, Ontario

J Harris

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Canadas

Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the original and a modified version of the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) among individuals with a lower limb amputation.

Design: Two week test-retest design.

Setting: South Western Ontario Amputee Program, London, Ontario, Canada.

Subjects: Consecutive sample of 84 individuals, primarily men (78.6%), mean age 56.5 years with a unilateral transtibial (71.4%) or transfemoral amputation related to traumatic (59.5%) or vascular causes.

Interventions: All subjects completed a questionnaire containing the FAI and other scales, the 2-minute walk and timed up and go tests during a regularly scheduled clinic visit. Fifty-five subjects completed a second FAI which was mailed to them two weeks later. Twenty-nine others completed the second FAI upon return for testing related to another project.

Main measures: FAI, Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Scale, 2-minute walk, timed up and go and walking device aid use.

Results: Relative reliability for the FAI (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.79) and FAI-18 (ICC = 0.78) was acceptable, however bias between measurements was detected. Hypothesized relationships (p B=0.001) between both FAI versions and the Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Scale, 2-minute walk and timed up and go test were observed. Significant group differences were observed for amputation cause, mobility device use, age and years as an amputee. Neither version distinguished between amputee level or gender groups.

Conclusions: The original and modified FAI are valid and reliable tools for unilateral amputees. Reliability is adequate to detect group but not individual level differences. Additional FAI-18 items did not substantially improve the ability to detect between-amputation-group differences.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A B. Deathe and W. C Miller The L Test of Functional Mobility: Measurement Properties of a Modified Version of the Timed "Up & Go" Test Designed for People With Lower-Limb Amputations Physical Therapy, July 1, 2005; 85(7): 626 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]