This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hammond, A Articles by Freeman, K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hammond, A Articles by Freeman, K Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The long-term outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of an educational–behavioural joint protection programme for people with rheumatoid arthritis

K Freeman

Rheumatology Department, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby, UK

Objective: To evaluate the long-term effects of joint protection on health status of people with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Design: A four-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial was conducted.

Setting: Two rheumatology outpatient departments.

Participants: People with rheumatoid arthritis less than five years since diagnosis.

Interventions: Two 8-hour interventions were originally compared: a standard arthritis education programme, including 2^1/2 hours of joint protection based on typical UK occupational therapy practice (plus 5^1/2 hours on RA, exercise, pain management, diet and foot care); and a joint protection programme, using educational-behavioural training.

Main measures: Adherence to joint protection, pain, hand pain on activity, Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 and Arthritis Self-efficacy were recorded at 0 and 4 years.

Results: Sixty-five people attended the joint protection and 62 the standard programmes. Groups at entry were similar in age (51 years; 49 years), disease duration (21 months: 17.5 months) and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and disease-modifying drugs. At four years, the joint protection group continued to have significantly better: joint protection adherence (p=0.001); early morning stiffness (p=0.01); AIMS2 activities of daily living (ADL) scores (p=0.04) compared with the standard group. The joint protection group also had significantly fewer hand deformities: metacarpophalangeal (MCP) (p=0.02) and wrist joints (p=0.04).

Conclusion: Attending an educational=behavioural joint protection programme significantly improves joint protection adherence and maintains functional ability long term. This approach is more effective than standard methods of training and should be more widely adopted.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. P. M. Vliet Vlieland Non-drug care for RA is the era of evidence-based practice approaching? Rheumatology, September 1, 2007; 46(9): 1397 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. van Lankveld, M. Franssen, and A. Stenger Gerontorheumatology: the challenge to meet health-care demands for the elderly with musculoskeletal conditions Rheumatology, April 1, 2005; 44(4): 419 - 422. [Full Text] [PDF]