This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Can augmented physiotherapy input enhance recovery of mobility after stroke? A randomized controlled trial

Objective: To discover if the provision of additional inpatient physiotherapy after stroke speeds the recovery of mobility.

Design: A multisite single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of augmented physiotherapy input with normal input on the recovery of mobility after stroke.

Setting: Three rehabilitation hospitals in North Glasgow, Scotland.

Subjects: Patients admitted to hospital with a clinical diagnosis of stroke, who were able to tolerate and benefit from mobility rehabilitation.

Intervention: We aimed to provide double the amount of physiotherapy to the augmented group.

Main measures: Primary outcomes were mobility milestones (ability to stand, step and walk), Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) and walking speed.

Results: Seventy patients were recruited. The augmented therapy group received more direct contact with a physiotherapist (62 versus 35 minutes per weekday) and were more active (8.0% versus 4.8% time standing or walking) than normal therapy controls. The augmented group tended to achieve independent walking earlier (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 0.90–2.43; p=0.12) and had higher Rivermead Mobility Index scores at three months (mean difference 1.6; 0.1 to 3.3; p=0.068) but these differences did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in any other outcome.

Conclusions: A modest augmented physiotherapy programme resulted in patients having more direct physiotherapy time and being more active. The inability to show statistically significant changes in outcome measures could indicate either that this intervention is ineffective or that our study could not detect modest changes.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 5, 529-537 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr768oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Wevers, I. van de Port, M. Vermue, G. Mead, and G. Kwakkel Effects of Task-Oriented Circuit Class Training on Walking Competency After Stroke: A Systematic Review Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2450 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Britton, N. Harris, and A. Turton An exploratory randomized controlled trial of assisted practice for improving sit-to-stand in stroke patients in the hospital setting Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 458 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Rehabilitation after Stroke N. Engl. J. Med., April 21, 2005; 352(16): 1677 - 1684. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Kwakkel, R. van Peppen, R. C. Wagenaar, S. Wood Dauphinee, C. Richards, A. Ashburn, K. Miller, N. Lincoln, C. Partridge, I. Wellwood, et al. Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2529 - 2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R P. Van Peppen, G Kwakkel, S Wood-Dauphinee, H J. Hendriks, P. J Van der Wees, and J Dekker The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2004; 18(8): 833 - 862. [Abstract] [PDF]