|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study
H C Dijkerman
Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
M Ietswaart
M Johnston
Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Dundee, UK
R S MacWalter
Stroke Studies Centre, Department of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
Objective: To assess the efficacy of motor imagery training for arm function in chronic stroke patients. The relation between mental processes such as attentional and perceived personal control over recovery, and motor imagery was additionally investigated.
Design and subjects: Twenty patients with long-term motor impairments (mean two years post stroke), were assessed before and after four weeks of training. Ten patients mentally rehearsed movements with their affected arm. Their recovery was compared with patients who performed nonmotor imagery (n =5), or who were not engaged in mental rehearsal (n =5).
Setting: Patients were recruited from the stroke database of Ninewells Hospital, Dundee. Assessment and training were performed at the patients' home.
Interventions: The motor imagery group was asked to practise daily imagining moving tokens with their affected arm. The nonmotor imagery group rehearsed visual imagery of previously seen pictures. All patients practised physically moving the tokens.
Main measures: The following variables were assessed before and after training: motor function (training task, pegboard and dynamometer), perceived locus of control, attention control and ADL independence.
Results: All patient groups improved on all motor tasks except the dynamometer. Improvement was greater for the motor imagery group on the training task only (average of 14% versus 6%). No effect of motor imagery training was found on perceived or attentional control.
Conclusions: Motor imagery training without supervision at home may improve performance on the trained task only. The relation between movement imagery, attention and perceived personal control over recovery remained unclear.
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 5,
538-549 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr769oa
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
S. J. Page, J. P. Szaflarski, J. C. Eliassen, H. Pan, and S. C. Cramer
Cortical Plasticity Following Motor Skill Learning During Mental Practice in Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
382 - 388.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Gueugneau, B. Mauvieux, and C. Papaxanthis
Circadian Modulation of Mentally Simulated Motor Actions: Implications for the Potential Use of Motor Imagery in Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
237 - 245.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Page, P. Levine, and J. C. Khoury
Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy Combined With Mental Practice: Thinking Through Better Motor Outcomes
Stroke,
February 1, 2009;
40(2):
551 - 554.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Knutson, T. Z. Hisel, M. Y. Harley, and J. Chae
A Novel Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment for Recovery of Hand Function in Hemiplegia: 12-Week Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
17 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Simmons, N. Sharma, J.-C. Baron, and V. M. Pomeroy
Motor Imagery to Enhance Recovery After Subcortical Stroke: Who Might Benefit, Daily Dose, and Potential Effects
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2008;
22(5):
458 - 467.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Braun, M. Kleynen, J. Schols, T. Schack, A. Beurskens, and D. Wade
Using mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a framework
Clinical Rehabilitation,
July 1, 2008;
22(7):
579 - 591.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Malouin, C. L. Richards, A. Durand, and J. Doyon
Clinical Assessment of Motor Imagery After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2008;
22(4):
330 - 340.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, J. P. Coxon, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow
Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke
Brain,
May 1, 2008;
131(5):
1381 - 1390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Dickstein and J. E Deutsch
Motor Imagery in Physical Therapist Practice
Physical Therapy,
July 1, 2007;
87(7):
942 - 953.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Page, P. Levine, and A. Leonard
Mental Practice in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Stroke,
April 1, 2007;
38(4):
1293 - 1297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Sharma, V. M. Pomeroy, and J.-C. Baron
Motor Imagery: A Backdoor to the Motor System After Stroke?
Stroke,
July 1, 2006;
37(7):
1941 - 1952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.-y. Yoo and B.-i. Chung
The effect of visual feedback plus mental practice on symmetrical weight-bearing training in people with hemiparesis
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2006;
20(5):
388 - 397.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Cicinelli, B. Marconi, M. Zaccagnini, P. Pasqualetti, M. M. Filippi, and P. M. Rossini
Imagery-induced Cortical Excitability Changes in Stroke: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
Cereb Cortex,
February 1, 2006;
16(2):
247 - 253.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. M. Pomeroy, C. A. Clark, J. S. G. Miller, J.-C. Baron, H. S. Markus, and R. C. Tallis
The Potential for Utilizing the "Mirror Neurone System" to Enhance Recovery of the Severely Affected Upper Limb Early after Stroke: A Review and Hypothesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2005;
19(1):
4 - 13.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
