SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Exel, N J.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bos, G A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Exel, N J.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bos, G A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What really matters: an inquiry into the relative importance of dimensions of informal caregiver burden

N JA van Exel

W BF Brouwer

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam; Department of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands

B van den Berg

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam; Department of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam and Centre for Prevention and Health Services Research, TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden, The Netherlands

M A Koopmanschap

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus University Rotterdam and Department of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands

G AM van den Bos

Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Objective: Prevailing measures of subjective caregiver burden either have no overall summary score or do not consider the relative importance caregivers attach to different dimensions of burden. Our aim was to assess which dimensions informal caregivers perceive as being important to their overall burden from care giving.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Subjects: Data were pooled from two Dutch samples of primary informal caregivers covering a wide range of chronic care-giving situations: caregivers for stroke survivors (n = 196) and caregivers for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 131).

Main measures: Subjective burden of care giving was assessed using the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) and the Self-Rated Burden scale (SRB).

Results: In the total sample four of the five dimensions of the CRA were found to contribute to the overall subjective burden experienced by informal caregivers. In the individual stroke and RA samples only two of the five dimensions emerged as relevant. SRB scores were significantly higher for caregivers of stroke patients, but no differences were found for the five dimensions of the CRA between the two samples.

Conclusions: The dimensions of CRA are not equally important to the overall subjective burden of informal caregivers. To assess overall subjective burden, a measure based on a caregiver's own assessment of burden such as SRB needs to be used in addition to prevailing measures.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 6, 683-693 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr743oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
T. Mittendorf, B. Dietz, R. Sterz, M. A. Cifaldi, H. Kupper, and J.-M. von der Schulenburg
Personal and economic burden of late-stage rheumatoid arthritis among patients treated with adalimumab: an evaluation from a patient's perspective
Rheumatology, February 1, 2008; 47(2): 188 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
M. W.M. Post, H. Festen, I. G. van de Port, and J. M.A. Visser-Meily
Reproducibility of the Caregiver Strain Index and the Caregiver Reaction Assessment in partners of stroke patients living in the Dutch community
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 2007; 21(11): 1050 - 1055.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
M. L. Luttik, T. Jaarsma, N. Veeger, J. Tijssen, R. Sanderman, and D. J. van Veldhuisen
Caregiver burden in partners of Heart Failure patients; limited influence of disease severity
Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2007; 9(6-7): 695 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc SciHome page
M. Pinquart and S. Sorensen
Correlates of Physical Health of Informal Caregivers: A Meta-Analysis
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, March 1, 2007; 62(2): P126 - P137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. McCullagh, G. Brigstocke, N. Donaldson, and L. Kalra
Determinants of Caregiving Burden and Quality of Life in Caregivers of Stroke Patients
Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2181 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement