Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, P.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, P.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.-L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Effects of visual feedback rhythmic weight-shift training on hemiplegic stroke patients

Pao-Tsai Cheng

Chin-Man Wang

Chia-Ying Chung

Chia-Ling Chen

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan

Objective: To assess the balance function of hemiplegic stroke patients and to investigate whether visual feedback rhythmic weight-shift training following acute stroke can decrease falls among patients with hemiplegic stroke.

Design: A prospective study, using a Balance Master.

Setting: Hospital-based rehabilitation units.

Subjects: Fifty-two hemiplegic stroke patients (28 in the training group and 24 in the control group).

Interventions: Conventional stroke rehabilitation programme plus visual feedback rhythmic weight-shift training. Training effect was evaluated by assessing the static and dynamic balance performance as well as comparing the occurrence of falls in the training and control groups at six-month follow-up.

Main measures: Occurrence of falls; static balance in different sensory conditions; and dynamic balance performance, including on-axis velocity and directional control during rhythmic weight-shift.

Results: Significant improvement in dynamic balance performance was found in hemiplegic patients in the training group. The improvement was sustained for six months. With regarding to static balance function, no significant improvement was found. At six-month follow-up, 5 of 28 patients (17.8%) in the training group had fallen, compared with 10 of 24 patients (41.7%) in the control group. The occurrence of falls decreased, although not statistically significantly (p = 0.059).

Conclusions: Visual feedback rhythmic weight-shift training may improve dynamic balance function for hemiplegic stroke patients. The effects of training may be sustained for six months. The occurrence of falls decreased in the training group, but not statistically significantly.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 7, 747-753 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr778oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Morioka, M. Hiyamizu, T. Fukumoto, Y. Kataoka, and F. Yagi
Effects of plantar hardness discrimination training on standing postural balance in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2009; 23(6): 483 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
A. P. Yelnik, F. Le Breton, F. M. Colle, I. V. Bonan, C. Hugeron, V. Egal, E. Lebomin, J.-P. Regnaux, D. Perennou, and E. Vicaut
Rehabilitation of Balance After Stroke With Multisensorial Training: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2008; 22(5): 468 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement