Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasova, K
Right arrow Articles by Zalisova, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rasova, K
Right arrow Articles by Zalisova, M
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Multiple Sclerosis
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Is it possible to actively and purposely make use of plasticity and adaptability in the neurorehabilitation treatment of multiple sclerosis patients? A pilot project

K Rasova

MS Centrum, Department of Neurology, Charles University in Prague and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

J Krasensky

Department of Magnetic Resonance and Radiology, Charles University in Prague and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

E Havrdova

MS Centrum, Department of Neurology, Charles University in Prague and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

J Obenberger

Department of Magnetic Resonance and Radiology, Charles University in Prague and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

Z Seidel

Department of Magnetic Resonance and Radiology, Charles University in Prague and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

O Dolezal

MS Centrum, Department of Neurology, Charles University in Prague and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

P Rexova

EuroMISE Centre of Charles University and Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic, Charles University in Prague and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

M Zalisova

MS Centrum, Department of Neurology, Charles University in Prague and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

Objective: To investigate whether neurorehabilitation is able to influence clinical parameters and brain function measured radiologically.

Design: A group of healthy probands was compared with two groups of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, one of which received rehabilitative therapy.

Setting: Outpatient in a university hospital.

Subjects: Twenty-eight patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), 17 of whom received rehabilitative therapy, and 13 healthy controls.

Interventions: Two months of rehabilitative eclectic therapy based on principles of sensorimotor learning and adaptation.

Main measures: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Beck Depression Inventory Score, Barthel Index, Environment Status Scale and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Results: Patients who underwent neurorehabilitation showed a greater drop in fatigue, depression, impairment, disability and handicap and more improvement in quality of life than those who did not receive therapy. Correlation of brain activity between the right and the left hemisphere is greater in healthy individuals than in MS patients. Neurorehabilitation resulted in a trend for increased correlation between the left and the right hemisphere in patients (approaching the standard). In comparison with control groups, signal amplitudes in anatomical areas did not show any significant changes.

Conclusion: Clinical changes seen with neurorehabilitation were not associated with any detectable changes in fMRI observations.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 2, 170-181 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr831oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The International Journal of Robotics ResearchHome page
M. Casadio, V. Sanguineti, C. Solaro, and P. G. Morasso
A Haptic Robot Reveals the Adaptation Capability of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
The International Journal of Robotics Research, November 1, 2007; 26(11-12): 1225 - 1233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
L. A Boyd, E. D Vidoni, and J. J Daly
Answering the Call: The Influence of Neuroimaging and Electrophysiological Evidence on Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2007; 87(6): 684 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement