This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bowen, A. Articles by Lowe, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bowen, A. Articles by Lowe, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Psychological services for people with stroke: compliance with the UK National Clinical Guidelines

University of Manchester, London, UK

Peter Knapp

School of Health, University of Leeds, London, UK

Alex Hoffman

Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK

Derek Lowe

Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK

Background: The UK National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke (2000) include recommendations on psychological services. The third National Sentinel Audit of Stroke was completed in 2001-2002.

Objectives: To examine the extent to which UK stroke services complied with the national guidelines.

Design: Use of three retrospective case note audits of hospital admissions, covering the period from admission to six months after discharge, and audits of how stroke services were organized.

Setting: Hospitals within England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.

Subjects: Stroke patients admitted consecutively within a three-month time frame.

Main measures: Compliance with the guidelines on mood disorders and cognitive impairments, and changes between audits.

Results: The 2001-2002 audit provided data on 60% of possible participants, from 145 hospitals and 5152 patients. Compliance with the guideline to screen for mood disturbance was poor; the median patient compliance rate of hospitals was 50%. More hospitals (88%) had a locally agreed cognitive assessment protocol in 2001-2002 than in 1998 (68%) and in 1999 (82%). However, actual rates of screening for cognitive difficulties were lower than implied by the existence of a local protocol. There were no strong case-mix associates of mood and cognitive screening. Access to clinical psychologists was poor. Mood and cognitive assessment rates were not much better for stroke units with access to clinical psychologists than for units without access (mood: p = 0.6, cognition: p = 0.09).

Conclusions: Although compliance with some of the guidelines has improved, many areas in current psychological services for stroke urgently need attention.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 3, 323-330 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr799oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Hart and R. Morris Screening for depression after stroke: an exploration of professionals' compliancewith guidelines Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 60 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF]