This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Svensson, S. Articles by Sunnerhagen, K. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Svensson, S. Articles by Sunnerhagen, K. S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Traumatic Brain Injury Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reliability and validity of the Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS) Swedish version 6.0

Institute for Clinical Neuroscience – Rehabilitation Medicine, Göteborg, Sweden

Ulla Sonn

Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen

Institute for Clinical Neuroscience – Rehabilitation Medicine, Göteborg, Sweden

Objective: To translate, to test inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Basic Care Needs (BCN) section of the Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS).

Design: Test–retest reliability and validity testing. Observed data were collected by the staff (nursing staff, occupational therapists).

Setting: Three rehabilitation units.

Subjects: Forty inpatients between 16 and 65 years of age with brain injury were included.

Main measures: Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability was calculated by percentage agreement (PA) and unweighted kappa measure. Concurrent validity was examined by computing Goodman–Kruskal's gamma, a nonparametric statistic for degree of association between the BCN score and the total score of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

Results: Inter-rater reliability showed a good percentage agreement between nursing staff. Between nursing staff and occupational therapists the percentage agreement was lower especially in one item. Intra-rater reliability showed a good percentage agreement for all assessors. Concordance was good with a gamma 0.83 and an asymptotic error (ase) of 0.04, for nursing staff and for occupational therapists — 0.87, ase 0.04.

Conclusion: The BCN section of NPDS was found to be inter-rater and intra-rater reliable, to have concurrent validity. Further studies are needed on clinical utility. The instrument can be used for assessment of dependency for individual patients with brain injury, and information when transferring between different caregivers. Further studies need to investigate the sensitivity of the instrument.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 4, 419-425 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr808oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Turner-Stokes, A. Shaw, J. Law, and H. Rose Development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2009; 23(10): 922 - 937. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Williams, R. Harris, and L. Turner-Stokes Can the Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment be used to estimate nursing staff requirements in an inpatient rehabilitation setting? Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2007; 21(6): 535 - 544. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E Plantinga, L J Tiesinga, C P van der Schans, and B Middel The criterion-related validity of the Northwick Park Dependency Score as a generic nursing dependency instrument for different rehabilitation patient groups Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2006; 20(10): 921 - 926. [Abstract] [PDF]