This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Flansbjer, U.-B. Articles by Lexell, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Flansbjer, U.-B. Articles by Lexell, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

What change in isokinetic knee muscle strength can be detected in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke?

Department of Rehabilitation, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

Anna Maria Holmbäck

Department of Physical Therapy, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

David Downham

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Jan Lexell

Department of Rehabilitation, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Health Sciences, Lulea°, University of Technology, Boden, Sweden

Objective: To assess the intra-rater (between occasions) test-retest reliability of isokinetic knee muscle strength measurements in subjects with chronic poststroke hemiparesis and to define limits for the smallest change that indicates real (clinical) improvements for stroke patients.

Subjects: Fifty men and women (mean age 589±6.4 years) 6=±46 months post stroke, able to walk at least 300 m with or without a unilateral assistive device.

Methods: Maximal concentric knee extension and flexion contractions at 608/s and 1208/s, and maximal eccentric knee extension contractions at 608/s, with the paretic and nonparetic limbs, were performed seven days apart using a Biodex dynamometer.

Measures: Reliability of the maximum peak torque measurements was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_2,1), the Bland and Altman analyses, the standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%) and the smallest real difference (SRD and SRD%).

Results: Test retest agreements were high (ICC_2,1 0.89-0.96) with no discernible systematic differences between limbs, angular velocities and modes. The SEM%, representing the smallest change that indicates a real (clinical) improvement for a group of subjects, was relatively small (8-20%). The SRD%, representing the smallest change that indicates a real improvement for a single subject ranged from 26% to 33% for concentric knee extension, from 39% to 55% for concentric knee flexion, and from 22% to 25% for eccentric knee extension.

Conclusion: Isokinetic knee muscle strength can be reliably measured and used to detect real improvements following an intervention for single subjects as well as for groups of subjects with chronic mild to moderate hemiparesis after stroke.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 5, 514-522 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr854oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.-c. Lin, Y.-w. Hsieh, C.-y. Wu, C.-l. Chen, Y. Jang, and J.-s. Liu Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 429 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y.-W. Hsieh, C.-H. Wang, S.-C. Wu, P.-C. Chen, C.-F. Sheu, and C.-L. Hsieh Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Barthel Index in Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 233 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF]