Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Molteni, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Molteni, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 6, 621-626 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr879oa

Taping versus electrical stimulation after botulinum toxin type A injection for wrist and finger spasticity. A case—control study

Stefano Carda

Franco Molteni

Ospedale Valduce–Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Costamasnaga (LC), Italy

Objective: To compare results from two approaches used in conjunction with botulinum toxin type A administration in rehabilitation: the application of a taping system and the electrical stimulation of the injected muscles and splinting.

Design: Case—control study.

Setting: Two tertiary care rehabilitation hospitals in Italy.

Subjects: Sixty-five adult subjects affected by spasticity of the wrist and finger flexors.

Interventions: After injection with botulinum toxin type A, the group at hospital A (n = 33) was treated with adhesive taping for six days and those at hospital B (n = 32) with electrical stimulation and splinting for six days. Spastic hypertonia at the injected muscles was assessed before treatment, one week and one month post injection.

Main measures: Modified Ashworth Scale.

Results: In group A, the mean Modified Ashworth Scale reduction was 2.76 ± 0.94 for wrist flexors and 2.45 ± 0.92 for finger flexors; in group B the mean Modified Ashworth Scale reduction was 2.18 ± 1.11 for wrist flexors and 2.1 ± 0.98 for finger flexors. The observed difference between the two groups was statistically relevant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Patients treated with adhesive taping and botulinum toxin type A achieved a greater reduction in spastic hypertonia as measured with Modified Ashworth Scale, with less time dedicated for the treatment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. H Bakhtiary and E. Fatemy
Does electrical stimulation reduce spasticity after stroke? A randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 418 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
S. Ozcakir and K. Sivrioglu
Botulinum Toxin in Poststroke Spasticity
Clin. Med. Res., June 1, 2007; 5(2): 132 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]