This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sackley, C. M Articles by Foxall, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sackley, C. M Articles by Foxall, A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The intra-rater reliability of the Balance Performance Monitor when measuring sitting symmetry and weight-shift activity after stroke in a community setting

Helen J Hill

School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK

Kate Pound

Division of Stroke Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK

Andy Foxall

Private Practitioner, UK

Objective: To examine the intra-rater reliability of sitting symmetry and weight-shift activity measurements in poststroke adults.

Design: An intra-rater reliability study.

Setting: A community setting.

Subjects: Adult stroke survivors attending stroke support groups within the community of Nottingham (UK).

Main measures: The Balance Performance Monitor used to measure sitting symmetry and weight-shift activity. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The Bland-Altman method for assessing agreement is also presented.

Results: We tested 49 participants (median age 73 years; interquartile range 68-81 years). Between-test reliability for sitting symmetry was high: ICC (1,1) = 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 ICC5 0.96). The mean difference between the measures () was-0.08 (95% CI-0.48 0.31); the standard deviation of the differences (SD_diff) was 1.383. The coefficient of repeatability was 2.76; the 95% limits of agreement were -2.850 and 2.682. Between-test reliability for weight-shift activity was also high: ICC (1,1) = 0.86 (95% CI 0.775 ; ICC5 ; 0.92). Bland-Altman = - 0.08 (95%CI-0.19 0.35), SD_diff = 0.936. The coefficient of repeatability was 1.87; the 95% limits of agreement were-1.792 and 1.952.

Conclusions: The 95% CI for d for both parameters crossed zero, indicating that between-test bias is unlikely. Sitting symmetry and weight-shift activity measures demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?