This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Boerner, K. Articles by Cimarolli, V. R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boerner, K. Articles by Cimarolli, V. R Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Disabilities Vision Impairment and Blindness Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Optimizing rehabilitation for adults with visual impairment: attention to life goals and their links to well-being

Verena R Cimarolli

Arlene R Gordon Research Institute, Lighthouse International, New York, USA

Objective: To examine the importance of different life goals among working-age adults with vision impairment, the extent to which vision impairment interfered with goals, and how rehabilitation addressed these life goals.

Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study.

Setting: Vision rehabilitation agency.

Subjects: Working-age adults with visual impairment.

Method: Telephone interviews using structured and open-ended assessments of life goal importance, goal interference due to vision loss, the role of goals in rehabilitation, and indicators of well-being.

Results: Eighty-six people participated. The life domains most frequently rated as extremely important were finances (60), residential and domestic arrangements (55), family (51), partner (48), and personal care (48). The extent to which vision loss interferes with these life goals was extreme for finances (46), residential and domestic arrangements (36), partner (27), family (25), and personal care (14). A life goal was addressed in rehabilitation: residential/domestic arrangements (41), work (39), finances (31), leisure/hobbies (28), personal care (24), family (17), partner (16), friends (10), and religion/life philosophy (8). Reports of a life goal being addressed in ineffective ways emerged for functional life goals, but not for relationship and religion/life philosophy goals. Goal interference was significantly correlated with well being indicators across life domains. In contrast only partner and family relationship importance were significantly linked with well-being indicators.

Conclusions: Relationship-related goals were a top priority for this study population, but functional compared to relationship goals were more commonly addressed in vision rehabilitation services.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 7, 790-798 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr893oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. K. Bambara, C. Owsley, V. Wadley, R. Martin, C. Porter, and L. E. Dreer Family Caregiver Social Problem-Solving Abilities and Adjustment to Caring for a Relative with Vision Loss Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 1585 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-W. Wang and K. Boerner Staying connected: re-establishing social relationships following vision loss Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 816 - 824. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. McNamara, R. Durso, and E. Harris Life goals of patients with Parkinson's disease: a pilot study on correlations with mood and cognitive functions Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2006; 20(9): 818 - 826. [Abstract] [PDF]