This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wade, D. T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wade, D. T Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Describing rehabilitation interventions

Rehabilitation is an effective process for reducing the morbidity and sometimes the mortality associated with many illnesses. This statement is supported by much evidence, but there is less evidence to support most specific actions undertaken in rehabilitation. In part this is inevitable because there are so many interventions. However the lack of an adequate system to classify and describe the complex interventions that constitute rehabilitation is also a great hindrance. This is in marked contrast to the detailed specification used in pharmacological research and reasonable description available for some surgical interventions. This editorial puts forward a classification system that is derived from two models relevant to rehabilitation: the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning model of illness and a model of rehabilitation described here. Interventions may be described in terms of the situations where these actions are applied, the immediate goals of any action, the level at which the intervention acts, the actions involved, the knowledge and skills needed to give the treatment, any specific equipment used, and any concomitant actions that may be necessary. In addition the context of the interventions should be described: the underlying theory or principles guiding actions, and the organization of the service internally, and in relation to other related services.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, No. 8, 811-818 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr923ed


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Wade Control in rehabilitation research Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2009; 23(8): 675 - 680. [PDF]

				L. Scobbie, S. Wyke, and D. Dixon Identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2009; 23(4): 321 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. H. G. Handoll, W. J. Gillespie, L. D. Gillespie, and R. Madhok Moving towards evidence-based healthcare for musculoskeletal injuries: featuring the work of the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Perspectives in Public Health, July 1, 2007; 127(4): 168 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. T Lettinga, S. van Twillert, B. J. Poels, and K. Postema Distinguishing theories of dysfunction, treatment and care. Reflections on 'Describing rehabilitation interventions' Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2006; 20(5): 369 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]