SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coughlan, A. K
Right arrow Articles by Storey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coughlan, A. K
Right arrow Articles by Storey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Wimbledon Self-Report Scale: emotional and mood appraisal

Anthony K Coughlan

Psychology Department, St James's University Hospital, Leeds

Peter Storey

Consultant Psychiatrist, St George's Hospital and Springfield Hospital, London

Self-rating scales currently in use for the detection of mood disturbance may not be suitable for use with neurological patients, or patients with substantial physical illness, because they employ items concerning activity and somatic or cognitive disorder and so are liable to produce a high level of false positive misclassifications. The development of a more suitable scale based purely on feelings, the Wimbledon Self-Report Scale (WSRS), is described. The WSRS provides a catalogue of the patient's adverse emotions for use in counselling and detects levels of mood disturbance that warrant further exploration. The classifications yielded by the scale are reliable and false positive and false negative rates are low. WSRS scores appear unaffected by sex or by age within the 18-80 year range.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 2, No. 3, 207-213 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/026921558800200305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
B van Baalen, E Odding, M P. van Woensel, M A van Kessel, M E Roebroeck, and H J Stam
Reliability and sensitivity to change of measurement instruments used in a traumatic brain injury population
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2006; 20(8): 686 - 700.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H. van Balen and T. Mulder
Beyond the stereotype: an epidemiological study on the long-term sequelae of traumatic brain injury
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 1996; 10(3): 259 - 266.
[PDF]



Advertisement