SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohannon, R. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bohannon, R. W
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rolling to the nonplegic side: influence of teaching and limb strength in hemiplegic stroke patients

Richard W Bohannon

School of Allied Health Professions, University of Connecticut

This study was undertaken to determine in patients with hemiplegia; (1) the influence of patient teaching on independence in rolling to the nonplegic side; and (2) the relationship between limb muscle strength and independence in rolling. Twenty patients who had experienced cerebrovascular accidents were studied. Their capacity to roll to the nonplegic side before, immediately after, and five minutes after instruction was measured. Also measured, but with a hand-held dynamometer, was the static strength of seven muscle groups of each extremity. The mean strength of each extremity's muscle groups was calculated and normalized against (divided by) body weight. Correlations were calculated between normalized strength scores and rolling capacity. The Cohran Q test demonstrated that the proportion of subjects rolling independently was significantly different before and after teaching. Rolling capacity during every trial was significantly correlated with the static strength of the limbs of the nonparetic side. The results suggest that teaching may be beneficial for increasing patient independence in rolling, but that such capacity is not independent of the patient's strength.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 2, No. 3, 215-218 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/026921558800200306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement