This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pardaens, K Articles by Van Houdenhove, B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pardaens, K Articles by Van Houdenhove, B Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

How relevant are exercise capacity measures for evaluating treatment effects in chronic fatigue syndrome? Results from a prospective, multidisciplinary outcome study

L Haagdorens

P Van Wambeke

A Van den Broeck

B Van Houdenhove

Chronic Fatigue Reference Centre, University Hospitals and Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of a multidisciplinary treatment programme for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychosocial variables, and exercise capacity measures.

Design: A six-month prospective outcome study.

Setting: University outpatient rehabilitation clinic; group setting.

Subjects: One hundred and sixteen women fulfilling chronic fatigue syndrome criteria.

Interventions: Cognitive behaviourally and graded exercise-based strategies; emphasis on adaptive lifestyle changes.

Measures: Short Form General Health Survey (SF-36); Symptom Checklist (SCL-90); Causal Attribution List (CAL); Self-Efficacy Scale (SE); maximum progressive bicycle ergometer test with respiratory gas analysis; and isokinetic leg strength test, before and after treatment.

Results: The total group significantly improved on nearly all reported HRQoL/ psychosocial variables. Changes in exercise capacity measures were rather modest and did not correlate or only weakly correlated with HRQoL/psychosocial variables. Subgroup analyses indicated that less fit patients improved significantly more on exercise capacity measures than their more fit counterparts. Patients who were fitter at baseline scored better on pretreatment HRQoL/psychosocial variables, but both subgroups improved similarly on these variables.

Conclusions: Health-related quality of life and psychosocial functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome improves after a six-month cognitive behaviourally and graded exercise-based multidisciplinary treatment programme. Increase in exercise capacity measures is not a necessary condition for reported improvements, except for less fit patients.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 1, 56-66 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr914oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Van Houdenhove and P. Luyten Customizing Treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia: The Role of Perpetuating Factors Psychosomatics, November 1, 2008; 49(6): 470 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Ayan, V. Martin, B. Alonso-Cortes, M.J. Alvarez, M. Valencia, and M.J. Barrientos Relationship between aerobic fitness and quality of life in female fibromyalgia patients Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2007; 21(12): 1109 - 1113. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Van Houdenhove, L. Verheyen, K. Pardaens, P. Luyten, and P. Van Wambeke Rehabilitation of decreased motor performance in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: should we treat low effort capacity or reduced effort tolerance? Clinical Rehabilitation, December 1, 2007; 21(12): 1121 - 1142. [Abstract] [PDF]