This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sheehan, J L Articles by Mudie, M H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sheehan, J L Articles by Mudie, M H Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A randomized controlled pilot study to obtain the best estimate of the size of the effect of a thermoplastic resting splint on spasticity in the stroke-affected wrist and fingers

School of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Royal Park Campus

U Winzeler-Merçay

School of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University

M H Mudie

School of Occupational Therapy, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia

Objective: To obtain the best estimate of the size of the effect of a thermoplasticresting splint on spasticity in the stroke-affected upper limb.

Design: A randomized controlled intervention involving 14 adults affected by stroke,allocated to two groups.

Setting: Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation departments.

Intervention: Following one week of baseline when neither group wore a splint, group 1 continued without a splint for week 2 and then wore a splint during week 3.Group 2 wore a splint during weeks 2 and 3. Both groups then wore a splint through weeks 4-7.

Main measures: A computerized torque apparatus was used to measure resistance at the wrist in newtons at every one-degree angle through the range of extension.Amount and rate of change in resistance was compared between the groups to obtain the best estimate of the size of the effect of splinting.

Results: Effect sizes were small and failed to reach the suggested smallest clinically worthwhile effect size for amount and rate of change in resistance in the short term. However, the average estimated size of the effect for rate of change with longer term splinting exceeded the smallest clinically worthwhile effect.

Conclusions: These findings and the fact that confidence intervals overlapped the smallest clinically worthwhile size of the effect for amount and rate of change in both short and long term suggest that a study with a larger sample is warranted.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 12, 1032-1037 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0269215506071267


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?