This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shimada, S. Articles by Baba, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shimada, S. Articles by Baba, H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Effect of compensation procedures for velocity on repeatability and variability of gait parameters in normal subjects

Shigeru Kobayashi

Division of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukui University Hospital, Fukui, Japan

Makoto Wada

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukui University School of Medicine, Fukui, Japan

Shinichi Sasaki

Hideo Kawahara

Division of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukui University Hospital, Fukui, Japan

Kenzo Uchida

Takafumi Yayama

Hisatoshi Baba

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukui University School of Medicine, Fukui, Japan

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a mathematical procedure that adjusts for gait velocity on the variability seen in gait analysis.

Design: Evaluation before and after compensation.

Setting: Gait laboratory, Fukui University Hospital, Japan.

Subjects: Fourteen normal volunteers.

Outcome measures: A computerized gait analysis system with two forceplates and a light source spot measuring device was used. Gait measurement in each subject was performed on three different days.

Results: The gait parameters measured on three different days were significantly different, particularly step length, stride length, velocity, the components of floor-reaction forces and hip motion. In these parameters, intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC (1,1) was not high (range 0.05-0.71). However, there was a high correlation between these parameters and velocity and high repeatability was obtained following compensation for velocity (ICC (1,1), range 0.73-0.97). In contrast, compensation of parameters whose measurement was not significantly different before compensation did not improve ICC (1,1). Variability of all parameters was acceptable, however CV (an index of variability) improved significantly after compensation compared with that before compensation in six of 15 parameters.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that low repeatability in gait parameters should be considered even when the gait of normal subjects is measured on different days. A high repeatability and more acceptable variability were obtained when the data were compensated for velocity.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 3, 239-245 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr935oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?