Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Clinical Rehabilitation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bernhardt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bernhardt, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Strapping the hemiplegic shoulder prevents development of pain during rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial

Amy Griffin

Cedar Court Rehabilitation Hospital and Broadmeadows Health Service, Broadmeadows, Victoria, Australia

Julie Bernhardt

National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville Campus, Victoria, Australia

Objective: To determine whether strapping (therapeutic or placebo) the ‘at risk’ shoulder prevented or delayed development of hemiplegic shoulder pain better than standard care.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Three inpatient rehabilitation hospitals, Melbourne, Australia.

Patients: Thirty-three patients ‘at risk’ of developing hemiplegic shoulder pain were randomized, one withdrew. Patients at risk were considered to be those with low or no muscle function around the shoulder (Motor Assessment Scale, upper arm score B<3).

Interventions: Standard care for control group. Therapeutic strapping or placebo strapping with lightweight adhesive tape. All strapping was maintained over four weeks.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was number of pain-free days measured on Ritchie Articular Index. Secondary outcome measures included range of movement, function (Motor Assessment Scale, upper arm component) and affected arm muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale).

Results: Only one patient in the therapeutic strapping group developed pain. One-way ANOVA revealed that mean number of pain-free days over the 28-day period was significantly different (P=0.02), with the difference between the therapeutic strapping and the control group. Patients in the therapeutic strapping group had a mean of 26.2 pain-free days, while those in the placebo group and control group had a mean of 19.1 and 15.9 pain-free days respectively. Range of movement and function improved between admission and discharge but were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions: Therapeutic strapping limited development of hemiplegic shoulder pain during rehabilitation in at risk stroke patients. Placebo strapping has an effect, with a larger study (n=30 per group) needed to detect whether there are differences between therapeutic and placebo strapping.

Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 4, 287-295 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr941oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement