This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stretton, C. M Articles by Anderson, C. S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stretton, C. M Articles by Anderson, C. S Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Determinants of physical health in frail older people: the importance of self-efficacy

School of Physiotherapy, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand

Nancy K Latham

The Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

Kristie N Carter

George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Arier C Lee

Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Craig S Anderson

George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Objective: There is continued uncertainty regarding the strength of association between performance-based and self-report measures of physical functioning, and of their relationship to self-efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study assessed the inter-relationships between such measures, and the predictors of ‘physical’ aspects of HRQoL in frail older patients.

Design: We used statistical models to determine the predictors of ‘physical’ HRQoL, according to the physical component summary score and the physical functioning domain of the 36-item short form (SF-36) questionnaire.

Setting: Patients were recruited from hospitals in Australia and New Zealand and followed up in their homes.

Subjects: Two hundred and forty-three frail older patients.

Main measures: Physical functioning was assessed using three performance-based measures (Timed Up and Go Test, gait speed and the Berg Balance Scale) and five self-report measures, including the modified falls self-efficacy scale, at three and six months after registration.

Results: A moderate association (r=0.48=0.55) was found between each of the performance-based and self-report measures, including the SF-36 physical component summary score. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that the performance-based measures and falls self-efficacy predicted 33% of the SF-36 physical component summary score. Falls self-efficacy was the single highest predictor of both the SF-36 physical component summary score and SF-36 physical functioning domain. A curvilinear relationship was found between the SF-36 physical functioning domain and two variables: falls self-efficacy and the Berg Balance Scale.

Conclusions: Although performance-based and self-report measures provide complementary but distinct measures of physical function, psychosocial factors such as self-efficacy have a strong influence on the HRQoL of frail older people.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?