| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr958oa Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacementRobert-Bosch-Hospital, Department of Geriatric Rehabilitation, Stuttgart and Bethesda Geriatric Hospital Ulm, Academic Centre at the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Department of Geriatric Rehabilitation, Stuttgart, I Unnewehr Bethesda Geriatric Hospital Ulm, Academic Centre at the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
University of Ulm, Department of Biometry and Medical Documentation, Ulm, Germany
Ecole Polytechnique Fé dérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Division for Research in Orthopaedics, Laboratory of Movements Analysis and Measurement, Lausanne, Switzerland, Germany
Bethesda Geriatric Hospital Ulm, Academic Centre at the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitationskrankenhaus, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany Objective: To investigate the correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of patients with total hip replacement. Design: Prospective preliminary trial comparing the Western Ontario and McMaster University questionnaire (WOMAC) and gait analysis preoperatively and three months postoperatively. Setting: A German academic orthopaedic centre specializing in total hip replacement surgery. Subjects: Seventeen patients (median age 70 years) with hip osteoarthritis. Intervention: All patients had had a primary unilateral total hip replacement. Main measures: WOMAC questionnaire to assess self-perceived health status and gait analysis to determine objective gait parameters. Results: Performance of walking as well as subjective judgement of health status improved following surgery (gait speed P = 0.0222; stride length P = 0.038; stance phase ratio P = 0.0466; WOMAC P < 0.0001). However, the correlation between gait parameters and WOMAC was poor (r = -0.27 or less). Correlation between changes of walking parameters and WOMAC was bad to good (r = 0.01 to r = -0.72). Conclusion: The WOMAC questionnaire might not reflect walking performance. The addition of gait analysis is recommended to gain objective information about the quality of gait.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||
