This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Large, J. Articles by Jennings, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Large, J. Articles by Jennings, N. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Using the Timed Up and Go Test to stratify elderly inpatients at risk of falls

Neesha Gan

Department of Physiotherapy, Sydney, Australia

David Basic

Department of Geriatric Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sydney, Australia

Natalie Jennings

Department of Physiotherapy, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Objective: To determine whether the Timed Up and Go Test is useful at stratifying acutely unwell elderly inpatients according to their risk for subsequent falls.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Multidisciplinary acute care unit for the elderly at Liverpool Hospital, in Sydney, Australia.

Participants: A total of 2388 consecutive admissions to the unit of mean age 82 years.

Intervention: The Timed Up and Go, administered on admission to the unit, and two modifications (an ordinal scale and a dichotomous scale, both incorporating patients unable to complete the Timed Up and Go) were evaluated.

Main outcome measures: Number of falls, and reasons for the inability to complete the Timed Up and Go.

Results: During a median length of stay of nine days, 180 patients had at least one fall. The Timed Up and Go was unable to identify those patients who subsequently fell (P=0.78). When the Timed Up and Go was modified to include the majority of patients unable to complete the test, both the ordinal (range of values 1-8, odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03-1.21, P=0.01) and dichotomous (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.09-2.32, P=0.02) modifications significantly predicted falls in multivariate analyses. Patients unable to do the Timed Up and Go due to non-physical disability had the highest fall rate (11%), followed by those with physical disability (9%), while those able to do the Timed Up and Go had the lowest fall rate (6%) (P<0.001). Acutely unwell, immobile patients with dementia and delirium were not at excessive risk of falls.

Conclusion: In the acute care setting, the value of the Timed Up and Go lies in the inability to complete the test, and the reasons for this inability, rather than the time recorded.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Christofoletti, M. M. Oliani, S. Gobbi, F. Stella, L. T. Bucken Gobbi, and P. Renato Canineu A controlled clinical trial on the effects of motor intervention on balance and cognition in institutionalized elderly patients with dementia Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 618 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Haines, S. S. Kuys, G. Morrison, J. Clarke, and P. Bew Balance Impairment Not Predictive of Falls in Geriatric Rehabilitation Wards J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2008; 63(5): 523 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]