Clinical Rehabilitation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mattsson, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mattsson, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Rehabilitation, Vol. 20, No. 6, 488-495 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr964oa
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Six-minute walk test in adults with cerebral palsy. A study of reliability

Christina Andersson

Lena Asztalos

Eva Mattsson

Neurotec Department, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden

Objective: To determine the reliability of a six-minute walk test in adults with cerebral palsy.

Design: Four repeated walk tests during two weeks.

Setting: The tests were conducted in a 40-m-long corridor at a rehabilitation centre for outpatients.

Subjects: Twenty-five adults (9 women and 16 men) with CP. Mean age 36 (26 58) years. Twelve subjects walked with walking aids and 13 without.

Interventions: No intervention.

Measures: The subjects were instructed to walk as far as possible for 6 min. The distance walked, heart rate and perceived exertion were assessed.

Results: Mean distances walked by the subjects in the four tests were 316, 336, 341 and 345 m. The repeatability between test 1 and the other tests was 66 m, and when the first walk test was excluded 40 m. The coefficient of variation (CV) between test 1 and the other tests varied between 7.1 and 8.7%, and when the first walk test was excluded between 3.7 and 4.5%. Intraclass correlation (ICC 1.1) was 0.97 in the four tests, and when the first walk test was excluded 0.99. Walking distance was longer (P<0.01) and varied less in subjects walking without walking aids (n=13) compared with subjects using walking aids (n=12).

Conclusions: Six-minute walk test showed high reliability, with a repeatability of 40 m. One practice test is recommended, as the walking distance in the first test was significantly shorter (P B=0.01) than the other three tests.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
T. Steffen and M. Seney
Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change on Balance and Ambulation Tests, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale in People With Parkinsonism
Physical Therapy, June 1, 2008; 88(6): 733 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
E. G Fowler, T. H. Kolobe, D. L Damiano, D. E Thorpe, D. W Morgan, J. E Brunstrom, W. J Coster, R. C Henderson, K. H Pitetti, J. H Rimmer, et al.
Promotion of Physical Fitness and Prevention of Secondary Conditions for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Section on Pediatrics Research Summit Proceedings
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2007; 87(11): 1495 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]